To the Family Member Who Worries I Am Not Helping Your Loved One’s “Weight Problem”

To the family member who worries I am not helping your loved ones "weight problem"
image by Representation Matters

Dear Family Member,

I understand your fears. I get it. You want the best for your loved one. You want him or her to have the best and healthiest and fullest life possible. I do too.

You believe that helping your loved one to lose weight will help achieve these goals. Here, I disagree—I will explain below.

You believe that weight loss will lead to better health. You have heard the scary information about the dangers of obesity and know there is an all-out war on obesity. Or you have seen or heard your loved one ridiculed or judged negatively by peers because they didn’t conform to a certain size.

 

However, did you know that:

I have been working in the field of eating disorders since my training at a bulimia research lab in 1991. When I first learned to treat binge-eating disorder, a course of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for binge eating was expected to be followed by a course of behavioral weight loss. However, since that time we have learned that behavioral weight loss doesn’t work. And while CBT for binge-eating disorder can be successful, it rarely leads to significant weight loss, even among those considered to be in an “overweight” weight category. However, CBT does lead to cessation of binge eating and prevention of further weight gain, which are lofty goals in their own right.

I firmly believe that bodies are meant to come in a variety of shapes and sizes. We are not all meant to be Size 0 or 2 or 4.

Take shoe size: while the average woman today has an 8 shoe size, most do not—some will have size 5 and others will have size 10. Shoe size has a normal distribution within the population.

Just as with shoe size, so it is with body weight. Every body appears to have a set point, a weight at which it functions optimally. This set point is not destined to be at the 50th percentile for every person—some will be heavier and some will lighter. Repeated attempts at dieting seem to increase a body’s setpoint, which is the opposite of what most dieters are trying to achieve.

I no longer support attempts at deliberate weight loss because I have come to believe it is not only fruitless but in fact harmful. Every day in my practice I witness the destruction left by the war on obesity and failed diet attempts. I see the carnage of past dieting, weight regain, shame and self-loathing in the form of disordered eating and intractable eating disorders. Against this backdrop, I believe that above all else, my duty to your family member is to not harm them.

There is no magic solution. Failing to fit the thin mold can be a burden. I wish I could wave a magic wand and have your loved one’s body transform into one that would not be stigmatized, would be celebrated, and would fit into all spaces. But I can’t change your loved one’s genetic body destiny, just as I can’t change any person’s ethnic background or skin color to conform to the privileged group. And I believe the solution is not to change your loved one’s body to conform—the solution is to fight to end weight stigma and the oppression of larger bodies.

Here’s what I can do:

  • I can help your loved one recover from an eating disorder, using evidence-based treatments backed by scientific research.
  • I can help your loved one work on accepting and appreciating their body and all its capabilities.
  • I can help your loved one unfetter themselves from self-imposed rules and restrictions and live a fuller life.
  • I can help your loved unburden themselves from shame and self-loathing.
  • I can help your loved one to advocate for themselves if he or she needs accommodations from a world that was not built to accommodate his or her body.
  • I can help your loved one learn to stand up to weight stigma and bullying.
  • I can help your loved one request and receive respectful health care.
  • I can help your loved one improve their relationship with food so that eating and social situations are enjoyable.
  • I can help your loved one achieve peace.

If you want these things for your loved one, please let me do what I was hired to do—guide your loved one to healthiest, best, and fullest life possible. Please examine the basis of your own hope that your loved one will conform to the thin standard. While I know this comes from a good place, it’s not pointing to the right destination. There are happier places to land. There is much work to be done. We all have weight stigma.

To learn more, I suggest reading the following articles:

Interested in Weight Loss? I CAN’T Help You. Here’s Why

Are We Setting Recovery Weights Too Low?

Is Weight Suppression Driving Your Binge Eating?

How Health at Every Size Can Help With Eating Disorder Recovery

July 2018 LACPA Eating Disorder SIG Event

Men Struggle, Too: My Journey with Binge Eating DisorderDate: Thursday, July 12th at 7:30 pm

Presenter: Ryan Sheldon, Eating Disorder Advocate

Title: Men Struggle, Too: My Journey with Binge Eating Disorder

Description: Description: I’m often asked what’s it like being a guy with Binge-Eating Disorder. It’s sad but true, many view eating disorders as female illnesses. Why is there so much shame about being a guy with an eating disorder? Why did it take so long for me to get diagnosed? Come join me to find out what it’s really like being a guy with Binge Eating Disorder. I will share my story and give you insights into working with males with eating disorders. Here’s a recent article.

Bio: Ryan Sheldon, founder of the blog Mr. Confessions formerly Confessions Of A Binge Eater, a blog he created to not only document his body image and eating disorder struggles but also to promote self love. He is proud to be a much-needed voice for men whose struggles all too often are neglected, while encouraging them to reach out for professional help. Ryan is currently working on a book and has a self-love Instagram account @BingeEaterConfessions

Location: The office of Dr. Lauren Muhlheim (4929 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 245, Los Angeles) – free parking in the lot (enter on Highland)

RSVP to: [email protected]

SIG meetings are open to all LACPA members. Nonmembers wishing to attend may join LACPA by visiting our website www.lapsych.org

Family-Based Treatment Can Help Depression and Self-Esteem Too!

FBT Depression and Self-Esteem

Family-based treatment (FBT) is a relatively new evidence-based treatment for adolescent eating disorders. It represents a paradigm shift from older treatments that focused on helping adolescents become independent from parents in order to recover from their eating disorder. In FBT, parents are central members of the treatment team and they are charged with guiding and changing their adolescent’s eating disorder behaviors. In FBT, the therapist meets weekly with the entire family, spending only about 5 minutes alone with the adolescent at the start of each session. It is designed as a standalone treatment. The adolescent is also followed by a medical doctor, but does not have additional appointments with a therapist or a dietitian.

Symptoms of depression and low self-esteem are common in adolescents with bulimia nervosa. One of the many concerns that I hear from parents considering Family-Based Treatment (FBT) for their child with anorexia or bulimia is that FBT won’t address other symptoms the child may have like depression or anxiety. Furthermore, families who are receiving FBT often feel pressured to add additional treatments such as individual psychotherapy for their adolescents to address these other issues. Even other non-FBT clinicians continue to be incredulous that adolescents can improve without other treatment. Fortunately, Cara Bohon, Ph.D. and colleagues at Stanford University recently published a paper that addresses this concern for adolescents with bulimia nervosa.

In their study, 110 adolescents with bulimia nervosa from two sites were randomly assigned to receive either individual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for adolescents or FBT. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT), which is the most successful treatment for adults with eating disorders, focuses on understanding the factors maintaining the bulimia symptoms and developing strategies to challenge problematic thoughts and change behaviors. The therapist meets weekly with the adolescent. The two treatments are of comparable lengths.

Results showed that both FBT and CBT significantly reduced symptoms of depression and improved self-esteem. Previous papers suggest that abstinence from eating disorder symptoms occurs faster in FBT when compared with CBT for adolescents with bulimia nervosa. Thus, FBT may be a better option in many cases.

It is important to dispel parents’ fears that FBT will not adequately address depression and self-esteem. The authors state in the paper, “This concern can subsequently steer families away from an evidence‐supported approach in favor of therapies that may not be as successful in reducing binge eating and purging.”

In fact, the researchers point out that it may be that the cycles of binge eating and purging of bulimia serve to maintain depressive symptoms and poor self-esteem. Thus, one may not need a treatment that directly targets depression.

Dr. Bohon stated, “The reason we conducted this study is because comorbid depression is the norm with bulimia nervosa, and it was important to establish that you don’t automatically need any extra treatment to see improvement in the context of FBT. Obviously, if someone is still struggling after completing FBT, a referral for CBT for depression or another evidence-based treatment would be important, but it is likely not needed for most individuals.”

Source

Valenzuela, Fabiola, James Lock, Daniel Le Grange, and Cara Bohon. 2018. “Comorbid Depressive Symptoms and Self-Esteem Improve after Either Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy or Family-Based Treatment for Adolescent Bulimia Nervosa.” European Eating Disorders Review: The Journal of the Eating Disorders Association26 (3): 253–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2582.

Are We Setting Recovery Weights Too Low?

Are we setting target weights too low

At the recent International Conference on Eating Disorders in Chicago, I attended a plenary, Recovery from an Eating Disorder: How Do We Define It? What Does It Look Like? And Should It Always be the Focus? During this plenary, Anna Bardone-Cone, PhD spoke about the essential components of recovery from an eating disorder. She indicated that definitions of recovery should include the following three domains and proposed the following criteria for each domain of eating disorder recovery:

  • Physical — defined as BMI greater than 18.5
  • Behavioral— defined as absence of any binge eating, vomiting, laxative use, or fasting within the past 3 months
  • Cognitive — defined as EDE-Q subscales within 1 standard deviation of age-matched community norms.

Hold on a second—the weight criterion used to define recovery from anorexia nervosa in most studies is a BMI of only 18.5?

Most in the full plenary room agreed that for anorexia nervosa recovery, a BMI of 18.5 is too low a criterion to declare all people recovered. I agree with Laura Collins Lyster-Mensh, who made the following tweets:

  • Isn’t it possible that by setting target weights at the low end of the tail we are holding patients in chronic mental illness.
  • Setting low, population-based weight targets for ALL EATING DISORDERS means weight suppression and malnourishment and prevents psychiatric recovery for all but those who are genetically designed to be in smaller bodies, IMO.

I totally agree. If we now acknowledge that anorexia can occur in people of higher weights—a phenomenon often, and problematically, called “Atypical Anorexia”—then shouldn’t a BMI target as low as 18.5 be abandoned in favor of individualized recovery weights?

In fact, weight suppression researcher Michael Lowe was present at the plenary.  During the Q&A he proposed that rather than using a categorical definition of weight recovery (a single BMI number) we should use a continuum—for example, the recovered patient’s BMI relative to their pre-illness BMI.

How Are Recovery Weights Established?

Unfortunately, there is very little consensus on how to determine whether a patient with a restrictive eating disorder is at a recovered or healthy weight. This affects research and practice. If researchers define recovery based on an 18.5 BMI and this weight is really too low for many people with anorexia, what does this mean for the research studies? For one thing, in clinical trials a lower percentage of people would be deemed “recovered”, showing our treatments to be even less successful than we believe them to be.

But it has bigger implications for the potential for patients to truly recover. If we set recovery weights higher, maybe more people will be treated to full recovery. Setting the BMI bar so low means we’re not insisting on full weight recovery for all people. As Laura Collins points out, the effect of this is that only those who are privileged enough to be in genetically smaller bodies may ever actually reach recovery.

And what are the ramifications for practitioners? There may not yet be an established way to determine a recovery weight—consequently, many patients may never recover. If we acknowledge that gaining to a healthy body weight is a prerequisite for full psychological recovery, then we are dooming many people in larger bodies to a life of purgatory in which they remain insufficiently sick to need intensive treatment, but never achieve full recovery.

In one recent paper, Jocelyn Lebow, Leslie A. Sim, and Erin C. Accurso survey 113 child and adolescent eating disorder treatment providers inquiring about the methods used to determine weight restoration in clinical practice. Their findings show:

  • 40.7% of practitioners used growth curve data
  • the remaining (nearly 60%) employed a diverse range of approaches
  • providers who specialize in Family-Based Treatment were significantly more likely to use an individualized approach versus considering adolescent preference

Lebow and colleagues concluded that:

Although there is a modicum of endorsement for using growth curves to predict expected body weight, this is not universal practice and is inconsistent with methods used in treatment studies. The lack of an evidence-based method to calculate expected body weight—or even a best practice consensus for calculating this number—is a major oversight in the field that requires empirical attention.

Why Might Providers Set Recovery Weights Too Low?

What are some of the reasons providers might be setting recovery weights too low?

  • No empirical consensus or guidelines on how to set target weight
  • Lack of available growth records data to determine an individualized recovery weight
  • Financial limitations—insurance companies reduce costs by lower treatment limits, which are facilitated by lower weight goals
  • Client resistance—pushing for higher weights requires overcoming greater resistance and anxiety from the patient and sometimes family over higher weights.
  • Weight stigma—even treatment providers may be susceptible to society’s war on obesity, and consequently may err on the side of under-restoring a teen in recovery.

Over twitter, one mother responded to my conference tweets about an 18.5 BMI recovery goal as being too low and tweeted the following:

  • We need all professionals to understand the need for higher recovery weights. Recovery is about state not weight. So many parents know this but are stuck with uneducated team members who undermine their work.
  • If professionals consider a return to pre-eating disorder growth patterns for height and weight to be weight restoration, we parents are saying wrong. Eating disorder voices are very loud at this weight. We recommend an additional 10% for the first few years of recovery at least. This quiets the eating disorder voice and patients are more likely to stay recovered.
  • I want all current professionals worldwide to understand this. There are so many parents in our international group whose professionals are not getting it. Maybe it has not been studied officially but anecdotally we are seeing this in high numbers. 
  • If it’s not part of their training, providers should at least listen to and support parents in this. We are committed to our kids’ recovery every bit as they are. 
  • It takes parents a while to get it too. It’s frustrating for professionals when parents undermine. I was horrified at the first proposed recovery weight and was afraid of my child being made fat. But I got educated pretty quickly, opened my eyes and realized I needed to take it further in order to achieve full recovery.

Stephanie Zerwas, Ph.D. (not at the conference) chimed in over Twitter and asked the parent:

  • What language helped you as a parent to “get it? Parents often have a belief that being a little underweight can help their child not worry about weight gain, not realizing that it keeps kids stuck in limbo and hypervigilant.

The parent responded:

  • What helped us parents “get it” was seeing those in our support group brave enough to take their kids to higher weights reporting their kids’ eating disorder voices finally quiet down. We keep repeating state, not weight = recovery and realized goal weights are set mostly too low 
  • Too many parents are upset that eating disorder professionals are saying their kids are recovered and not listening to them when they say their kids are still vulnerable, using behaviors, and need to be a higher weight. This is the power of parent groups. We know this needs to change. 
  • Parents also not understanding weight restoration is a moving target. They come to our group stating their child is weight restored and still struggling and often clinging to a weight goal given years ago. There is no “Weight Restored” in eating disorder recovery only “state restored.” 
  • We are seeing this extra 10% to be effective in many of our children who still struggle with eating disorder behaviors at 100% pre-illness percentile of growth. In the meantime, if patients are still struggling and parents want this, we should be supported. But yes, bring on the studies!!

What Do Parents Say About Recovery Weights?

So, believing that parents do indeed know their children best and are an untapped resource to study this further, I took to Twitter to ask parents to share their experiences about recovery weights being set too low. I got an overwhelming response. Below are some excerpts of what parents sent to me:

  • At her lowest weight, our daughter was BMI of 21.9. Our doctor told us “she is not at an anorexic weight.” She is currently BMI 31.6. We felt she was finally starting to shift her thinking when she was at around a BMI of 29.5.
  • When my daughter was 17, she lost 25 pounds. At her lowest, her BMI never fell below 20. Yet she was extremely ill. After she had regained about 14 pounds, her period returned, but her “state” was still awful. She is now in a range of BMI 25.5 to 26. The difference this last 5 pounds has made had been amazing. Her level of insight and flexibility is much higher. Amazingly, the higher her weight, the happier she is with herself and her body. Reflecting back, I am grateful that no one told us she was “recovered” when she got her period back. She needed to get and stay back up to the 80 to 85%ile as per her personal growth curve. At the age of 19.75 she grew another .25 inch. If that isn’t proof she needed more weight, I don’t know what is! I hear so many stories in our group of parents being told to stop refeeding too early. Teams are generally not comfortable pushing weights back up to or above personal growth curves. We are lucky our team was an exception! In our online support group, we have seen time and time again that higher weights make a difference. And the extra weight generally comes with little risk.
  • My daughter was diagnosed at the age of 10.5 with anorexia. The original goal was to get my daughter at a BMI of 15.5 to a BMI of 18. In the next 2.5 years my daughter needed 6000 calories a day and a very high fat diet. She grew nearly 9 inches, went through full puberty, and doubled her initial body weight. Once her growth slowed and her metabolism went down and stabilized, we were able to get her weight up to around a BMI of 22 and that is when we saw TRUE RECOVERY begin. She began to eat “extra.” She began to ask for things. She began to be able to eat independently. Over the last 4 years she has put on around 20 to 25 pounds on her own, naturally. Her BMI is now around 24 – 25 and she is in a 100% solid recovery. She eats intuitively, independently, and reports being free of the eating disorder voice. Fats, high calories, and a MUCH higher weight were essential to getting our daughter into recovery. If I would have listened to the “experts” I believe she would still be struggling.  
  • My daughter was 24.2 BMI at 13 years old when she started exercising excessively and then restricting. She lost a quarter of her body weight in 7 months and our new pediatrician told her to gain 10 pounds and come back in 6 weeks. We fed her 6 times for a total of 4000 calories a day. She finally got her period at BMI 21.8 and within a few months, her anxiety was high and the team suggested it was time to start exercising. My online support group spent a long time helping me understand my own fat phobia and really worked to help me set a higher target weight. My daughter grew another three inches. She is now BMI 23.5 and this is the healthiest I have ever seen her. If I had listened to the specialists, she would be just as sick as she was before.  
  • At her lowest weight and her sickest, my daughter’s BMI was 19.3. We saw improvements in her state once she was over 25 BMI and in the “overweight” range. Had I allowed a reduction in her food intake at 23 BMI when it was suggested to me, my daughter would have been in a perpetual eating disorder purgatory.
  • My daughter’s current BMI is 24.6. Lower than that or increasing muscle over fat, it is as if her body goes into ‘starvation mode’ and she gets all silly and cranky and her period is delayed.
  • My son was given a target BMI of 19 by his clinician. This was not from a growth chart, it was from a generic BMI chart. My son was still very unwell at that BMI. Thoughts were very strong, and the desire to restrict was high. He was living a half-life, tormented with the anorexia. He was throwing away his lunch and manipulating weight. His clinician was adamant that he did not need more weight, and did not need more food, although I could see he was actually starving. She would not support me to take his weight higher or increase his meal plan. My online support group warned me that this was a common mistake with clinicians. I got my son (with great difficulty, after the clinician had insisted lower was okay), to a BMI of 24. We have never looked back. We have our kid back, he is 16 years old, he is in very strong recovery for some time now. I know the extra weight is what he needed to see recovery. He is living a normal teen life now, is happy and fully functional. We are into year 3 now, and he still needs 3 meals and 2 snacks per day of at least 4000 calories to stay in recovery. We owe our son’s recovery to the wonderful advice from parents that had been in our situation before us. They knew from other parents before them that a generic BMI figure is not recovery. Recovery is a state and not a weight. It makes perfect sense too. After all we do not expect everybody to have the same shoe size.  
  • My daughter was diagnosed approximately 18 months ago with Atypical Anorexia and was very unwell at a BMI of 19. I joined a support group just prior to her entering into treatment. In large part due to the anecdotal advice and experience of others in the group, I was of the firm belief that we needed to weight restore my girl to her own individual weight, not to a particular BMI or any particular upper number. Fortunately, our team was happy for me to take the lead with this approach, and we encouraged weight gain to wherever her behaviors began to abate and her weight settled naturally on its own, with NO reduction in intake. This ended up being at a BMI of around 26, which I do not believe most clinicians would encourage. However, I truly do have my happy girl back and I do not regret any one of those extra kilos. Her body has settled at a weight at which her mind is very well. I believe that if we had been given an upper number that she couldn’t go above, that we would have trapped her in her anorexia needlessly for so much longer.
  • My daughter did not seem to actually begin true recovery until she was at 23.5 BMI.  This was higher than the professionals in her life seemed comfortable with, but I proceeded with semi-confidence (having seen the results of higher weights in other patients, through their carers’ stories) and was never challenged.  Before this higher BMI she struggled so much with ED thoughts and behaviors – very little could get through to her…. therapy, talking, coaching, none was very helpful… only FOOD, in larger amounts that some professionals recommend (specifically with regards to fats – avocados, ghee/butter, olive oil).  At 23.5 something seemed to just “lift”.  She began to be able to participate for herself. She still had many ED behaviors and thoughts, but could push them aside much of the time.  She lost most of her body image issues, and began asking for food outside of the meal plan – especially things she used to enjoy (chocolate, etc.).  Unbelievably, she began asking for MORE food. Consensus among carers in the groups seems to be that 22-25 BMI is where most sufferers see true strides in recovery.  It is very, very rare that BMI under 22 is successful, at least when polled on the peer-to-peer carer support groups.  Most often, it seems as though 23-24 is the “sweet spot” for many.  My daughter has remained at this BMI (just shy of 24) for almost 6 months.

Summary of Recovery BMI

One online support group did their own survey: ” at what BMI did you see real recovery?”

Here are the responses ( note that most were given a target bmi of 19 by their clinician, and had to fight against that, or had to walk away from their provider to get their child into recovery)

BMI 21-22      4

BMI 22            3

BMI 22-23      4

BMI 23            1

BMI 23-34      5

BMI 24            4

BMI 24-25      4

BMI 25            4

So out of 29 respondents,  none got their kid into recovery at BMI 19 OR 20.

Stay Tuned for A Survey For Parents

I think this is an important issue that deserves more attention. I am working with the same researchers who did the above study to more formally study parents’ perceptions of their childrens’ recovery. Stay tuned for a survey so we can continue to learn from your parental wisdom.

If you interested in learning more about this study, please click here.

Sources

Jocelyn Lebow, Leslie A. Sim & Erin C. Accurso (2017): Is there clinical consensus in defining weight restoration for adolescents with anorexia nervosa?, Eating Disorders, DOI: 10.1080/10640266.2017.1388664

“Normal” Teen Eating

Normal Teen Eating

Parents are often surprised by the high energy needs of teen girls. This is especially true for those faced with restoring a malnourished teen’s weight.

 

But even parents of healthy teens can become confused about what is “normal” in a culture where dieting is pervasive.

 

This is what normal teen eating looked for this 16 year-old teen on one day. She was out of the house, walked about 2 to 3 miles, and got to choose all of her food. This teen is healthy, has good energy, and enjoys food. She is not usually very active. Not every day of eating is the same.

 

  • Breakfast
    • 1 piece of French toast with butter and syrup, a few tablespoons of hash browns
    • 3/4 of a Belgian waffle with whipped cream and syrup
    • 2 pork sausage links
  • Lunch
    • 4 pieces of tuna on crispy rice (could not finish the 5th)
    • An order of salmon sushi
  • Snack
    • 2 scoops of ice cream
  • Dinner
    • 1 fried chicken taco in lettuce with cabbage
    • 1 steak taco in a corn tortilla
    • 1/2 serving of creamed corn
    • Horchata (beverage)
  • Snack
    • A half wedge of blue cheese with crackers

I share this because it may be difficult for parents when teens eat the foods diet culture tells us are bad. Instead, it may be a way of creating a healthy relationship with all food and getting their high energy needs met.

May 2018 LACPA Eating Disorder SIG

Gretchen Kubacky, Psy.D. on Polycistic Ovary SyndromeDate: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 7 pm

Presenter: Gretchen Kubacky, Psy.D.

Title: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Eating Disorders: What’s the Connection?

Description: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is currently estimated to affect up to 22% of women. It is the primary cause of female infertility and other endocrine disruptions. Women with PCOS have much higher rates of depression, anxiety, and eating disorders, particularly Binge Eating Disorder. Dr. Gretchen will present an overview of the physical and psychological symptoms of PCOS, how those symptoms present clinically, and discuss the challenges of appropriately diagnosing and treating eating disorders in women with PCOS. 

Bio: Gretchen Kubacky, Psy.D. is a health psychologist with a private practice located in West Los Angeles. Dr. Gretchen works primarily with hormonal issues and chronic and invisible illnesses, with a specialty in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). She is the creator of PCOS Wellness, a Certified PCOS Educator, and a member of the PCOS Challenge Health Advisory Board.  She is also a Certified Bereavement Facilitator for children and adults, co-editor of the Los Angeles Psychologist magazine, and a frequent speaker and author on health psychology topics. For more information about her private practice and PCOS education services, see www.DrGretchenKubacky.com and www.PCOSwellness.com.

Location: The meeting will be held in the office of Dr. Gretchen Kubacky, located at The Gardens building, 2001 South Barrington Avenue, Suite 121, Los Angeles, CA  90025 at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 15, 2018. Suite 121 is on the ground floor, at the north end of the building. After 6:00 p.m., you may park for free on the ground floor of the building. The parking entrance is located on the south end of the building, adjacent to Yoga Raj studio. There is also free and metered parking on the streets surrounding the building. The building and office are wheelchair accessible. 

RSVP: [email protected]

SIG meetings are open to all LACPA members. Nonmembers wishing to attend may join LACPA by visiting our website www.lapsych.org

On Empowering Parents—Not Pathologizing Them

On empowering parents -- not pathologizingI often write about the importance of including parents in the treatment of adolescents and young adults. My work is informed by my training in Family-based Treatment (FBT), which as a central part of treatment seeks to empower parents to help their ailing children with eating disorders to return to health. When asked why families should be the center of treatment, I usually cite the AED guidelines on the role of the family, The Nine Truths About Eating Disorders, and the vast evidence base underlying FBT. I often discuss how providers who see families with children with eating disorders get a distorted view of the family: they do not have the benefit of having seen how it functioned prior to the eating disorder. Parents’ behaviors are often pathologized when they are actually the normal response of healthy parents to a child in distress.

This post is different—here I will share a more personal perspective.

Recently, one of my children (anonymized here because the story is theirs to tell) stumbled. My child was fighting a mental health issue that was not an eating disorder. The experience of watching my child struggle, and struggling to help my child, has further informed my thinking on this issue.

Sadly, it remains common for parents of children, adolescents, and young adults with mental health problems to be judged, labeled, blamed, and excised from the child’s treatment. This has happened to families with whom I have worked. Parents have sometimes been labeled as “enmeshed” or “overprotective.” This is not productive.

I’m writing this blog to share how beneficial it was personally to be included in my young adult child’s treatment. First, let me give you some background.

For Most of My Parenting Years, I Was Balanced

I care for my children deeply and have chosen a career that has allowed me the flexibility to be present in their lives and to be their primary caretaker. At the same time, I have been anything but a coddler. All three of my children were sleep-trained at less than six months, left at a young age with non-family babysitters, and dropped at preschool on the first day. I shed some tears, but I was not a parent who stayed and watched outside of the classroom for months; I went to work.

I also developed a certain toughness to set limits. During my kids’ early years, I worked at Los Angeles County Jail, where I encountered numerous inmates demanding sleeping medications or “more desirable” housing assignments and then threatening suicide when they didn’t get their way. I became a pro at placing inmates on suicide watch and walking away despite their sometimes yelling at the top of their lungs that they would tell the entire jail, “It’s because of you, Dr. Muhlheim, that I will kill myself.”

I am not a perfect mother, but I am a highly dedicated, devoted one. I have sought to balance my joy in raising my children with time to pursue my own interests and career.

When My Child Started to Struggle I Became Highly Involved

When I work with parents of teens and young adults with eating disorders, I encourage parents to trust their instincts. “Parents know their kids best,” I tell them. During the transition to college, when my child was supposed to be individuating, I knew something was amiss, so I hovered more than usual.

Fortunately, when my child wobbled, I was prepared. I trusted my instincts. I was fully present: watching, standing close, getting my child help. I helped save my child’s life. There are powerful cultural expectations that parents should back off and allow their child to individuate. There is less support for parents who choose to step in at this moment. Observing my behavior at that time, I may have been labeled as overprotective.

Even my child, who recognized the need for parental help, was fighting against it. This was confusing to their therapist, who later wrote in a report, “There is a weird dichotomy between the child and the parents. The child refuses to sign a release of information for the therapist to speak to the parents, but the child appears to reach out to the mother for support.”

Rather than pathologizing hovering parents, we need to recognize that they are doing it for a reason.

Professionals Supporting, Not Blaming Parents

The hardest moments of this whole journey were those times that, on top of his worry for our child and whether they could or would actually recover, my husband blamed himself for causing the problems our child was facing. This tendency of parents—to blame themselves for any problem that befalls a child—is typical, whether or not the problem could be attributed to parenting. I noticed that when my husband started to blame himself, we both became hopeless and lost focus on helping our child. These were dark times—it was hard to have our own faith and be present for our child.

Fortunately, we had the means to seek out high-quality treatment. Our child was treated in a center that specializes in treatment often used for a problem for which parents have historically been blamed. In this program, we as parents were given much-needed support and services as well. Importantly, the clinicians never indicated they believed that we had caused our child’s problems. Instead, we were validated, supported, and given a framework for understanding our child’s problems that did not point the finger at us.

Made/Makes All the Difference

Further, our responses to our struggling child were validated as a reasonable response to experiencing our child’s struggles. We were supported in our child’s recovery, empowered to play a role, included in the treatment, and seen as parents doing our best. This was profound. I think it made all the difference.

Our child worked hard and so did we. With the proper help and our support, our child is now healthy and firmly back on track. My hope for other parents of floundering adolescents and young adults is that they are treated with the same respect that we were.

How To Choose A Supplemental Nutrition Shake

Katie Grubiak, RDN at Nutritional Supplement taste test By Katie Grubiak, RDN

In a previous post, we discussed the role of supplemental nutritional shakes in eating disorder recovery. Sometimes, patients in recovery will be unable to restore their nutrition entirely with food. In these cases, the use of supplements can be invaluable. If you or a loved one are restoring nutrition from an eating disorder, you should be under the care of a medical doctor (MD) & registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN).

In this post, we will continue the discussion about supplements, comparing different supplement brands based on caloric density per ounce, macronutrient comparison (fat, carbohydrates, protein), and label advertising. Lastly, we’ll rate them for taste and palatability.

Caloric Density

Substantial caloric density per ounce is the most important factor in the selection of a liquid supplement. To optimize replacing calories in a meal, we recommended selecting a product that delivers at least 300 calories per 8- to 11-ounce serving. Any under-300 calorie product is insufficient to replace a meal or even a majority of a meal for someone in recovery from an eating disorder, and should instead be treated as a calorically dense beverage to be added alongside a meal or snack. Alternatively, multiple shakes—2 or 3—can together replace a meal.

Serving size is important. Any product that comes in serving sizes larger than 11 ounces has the risk of being too filling—someone recovering from an eating disorder may not finish it, meaning that the precious calories will never be delivered.

Macronutrient Comparison

A comprehensive liquid supplement should be evaluated against the same dietary recommendations as a normal meal. The caloric nutrients or “macronutrients” that we hope to balance in a meal are protein, carbohydrates (carbs), and dietary fat. The goal is that supplements have a macronutrient profile similar to a balanced plate.

Macronutrients are often measured in terms of “exchanges”:

  • Fats: One dietary fat exchange equals 5 grams of fat. A recovery meal is often recommended to include at least two to four fat exchanges. Aim for 10-20 grams fat in an 8-11 ounce supplement.
  • Carbohydrates: One carb exchange equates to 15 grams of total carbohydrates. Meals in recovery are recommended to include at least two to four carb exchanges. Aim for 30-60 grams total carbs in an 8-11 ounce supplement.
  • Protein: One ounce of meat, chicken, or fish equates to one protein exchange, or 7 grams of protein. Meal building suggestions for animal or vegetarian protein sources are usually anywhere from two to four exchanges. Aim for 14-28 grams protein in an 8-11 ounce supplement serving.

I don’t advise comparing micronutrients—the trace amounts of added vitamins and minerals—among products because this is not important when the goal is increased intake. Instead, stay focused on the caloric constitution of a supplement including its macronutrient profile so that the primary objective of ensuring weight gain or maintenance is achieved.

Ingredients

Products labels can sometimes bear so much “health” messaging that it can be difficult to pull out what is truly important. One product label claims a better, more natural ingredient; another vouches it is more “non”-something than any other product…. This can get confusing!

To streamline the process, we recommend starting off with identifying whether or not the product is dairy free. This is an important concern for people who keep Kosher, are lactose intolerant, or have a milk protein allergy. Look specifically to see if the product says dairy-free, or suitable for lactose intolerance (might have dairy/lactose but in low concentrations). If you have a milk protein allergy, specifically screen for such ingredients as milk protein concentrate, casein (all forms), whey (in all forms), & milk (in all forms).

Second: identify whether or not gluten is an issue for you. You only need to do this if you have a known gluten issue diagnosed by a medical professional—for most people, gluten is a harmless component of a normal diet. If gluten is an issue, check to see whether the supplement is labeled gluten-free.

Third: check the label for any other known food allergy ingredient.

Last, check the “Nutrition Facts” on the back label for calorie and macronutrient comparison. I suggest stopping there and not diving into a deeper ingredient comparison. Any scrutinizing beyond this is unimportant and likely giving the eating disorder too much power. In the end, this kind of label attention diverts from the true function of the use of supplementation in eating disorder recovery—to replace calorically a substantial meal with a concentrated liquid when all or partial meal cannot be consumed.

To reiterate, your primary considerations when choosing a supplement are caloric density and macronutrient profile. Weight maintenance and weight gain comes from calories—not from the presence of more natural ingredients or the absence of processed ones. It’s understandable to want to use a supplement that checks off every box marked “healthy”—but this can add fuel to the eating disorder’s fire.

Labeling is part of the product—you can’t avoid it. But you don’t have to let the eating disorder make choices based on irrelevant labeling information that appeases its instincts. When you provide a supplement to a family member in recovery, you can always remove or cover up the label, or simply pour it into a cup, to reduce a triggering reaction.

 

EDTLA reviewed a number of supplement brands and taste-tested some of them. Taste was rated on a scale of 1 (yuck) to 10 (yum). Each brand has numerous product variations in its lineup—we were not able to review every variety. Note that many drugstore and grocery chains carry their own store brands – of these, we included Rite Aid, CVS, and Kroger in our analysis and tasting.

 

Ensure Product Family

Ensure brand nutritional supplementsEnsure Original

Product positioning: #1 doctor recommended brand, kosher, gluten-free, suitable for lactose intolerance, not for people with galactosemia

Calories: 220 calories per 8-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 6 g fat, 33 g total carbs, 9 g protein

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: corn maltodextrin, sugar. Protein sources: milk protein concentrate. Fat sources: canola oil, corn oil

EDTLA TASTE RATING: Not tasted

Ensure Plus

Product positioning: 50% more calories than Ensure Original, gluten-free, suitable for lactose intolerance, not for people with galactosemia, balanced nutrition to help gain or maintain a healthy weight, kosher, gluten-free, suitable for lactose intolerance

Calories: 350 calories per 8-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 11 g fat, 50 g total carbs, 13 g protein

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: corn maltodextrin, sugar. Protein sources: milk protein concentrate, soy protein isolate. Fat sources: blend of vegetable oils (canola, corn).

EDTLA TASTE RATING: Chocolate flavor 8; Strawberry flavor 7; Vanilla flavor 8

 

Ensure Enlive

Product positioning: designed to help rebuild your strength and energy from the inside, with an ALL-IN-ONE blend to support your health. The label claims bone, muscle, heart, digestion, & immune support, flavored-natural & artificially flavored, suitable for lactose intolerance, gluten-free, kosher, not for people with galactosemia

Calories: 350 calories per 8-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 11 g fat, 44 g total carbs, 20 g protein

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: corn syrup, sugar, short chain fructo-oligosaccharides. Protein sources: milk protein concentrate, sodium caseinate, soy protein isolate, whey protein concentrate. Fat sources: corn oil, canola oil.

EDTLA TASTE RATING: Strawberry flavor 8

 

Ensure Clear

Product positioning: great-tasting, clear liquid nutrition drink that contains high-quality protein and essential nutrients, fat free, gluten-free, suitable for lactose intolerance

Calories: 200 calories per 6.8-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 0 g fat, 43 g total carbs, 7 g protein

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: sugar, corn syrup solids. Protein sources: whey protein isolate

EDTLA TASTE RATING: Apple flavor 8. Also available in mixed berry (not tasted)

 

Boost brand nutritional supplementsBoost Product Family

Boost

Product positioning: a great-tasting nutritional drink as a mini-meal or between-meal snack with 26 vitamins & minerals, 3 g of fiber, & 10 g of high quality protein, gluten-free, suitable for lactose intolerance, not for individuals with galactosemia, kosher

Calories: 240 calories per 8-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 4 g fat, 41 g total carbs, 10 g protein

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: corn syrup, sugar, fructo-oligosaccharides. Protein sources: milk protein concentrate, soy protein isolate. Fat sources: vegetable oil (canola, high oleic sunflower, corn)

EDTLA TASTE RATING: Not tasted

 

Boost Plus

Product positioning: helping to achieve and maintain a healthy weight, 3 g fiber, 26 vitamins & minerals, gluten-free, suitable for lactose intolerance, not suitable for people with galactosemia, kosher

Calories: 360 calories per 8-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 14 g fat, 45 g total carbs, 14 g protein.

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: corn syrup, sugar. Protein sources: protein concentrate, soy protein isolate, fructo-oligosaccharides. Fat sources: vegetable oil (canola, high oleic sunflower oil, corn)

EDTLA TASTE RATING: Chocolate flavored 6; Vanilla flavored 5

 

Boost Breeze

Product positioning: a convenient source of additional protein & calories in a fruit-flavored drink, suitable for lactose intolerance, gluten-free, kosher, not for individuals with galactosemia

Calories: 250 calories per 8-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 0 g fat, 54 g total carbs, 9 g protein

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: sugar, corn syrup. Protein sources: whey protein isolate (milk)

EDTLA TASTE RATING: Peach flavored 7 (“like peach Snapple”); Berry flavored 6 (“like Hi-C”), Orange flavor 3 (“medicine like”)

 

Store brand nutritional supplementsStore Brands

Rite Aid Original Nutrition Shake

Product positioning: advertised compare to Ensure, natural & artificial flavors, gluten free, suitable for lactose intolerance, not for people with galactosemia, kosher

Calories: 220 calories per 8-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 6 g fat, 33 g total carbs, 9 g protein.

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: corn maltodextrin, sugar, sucromalt. Protein sources: milk protein concentrate, soy protein isolate, pea protein concentrate. Fat sources: soy oil, canola oil

EDTLA TASTE RATING: Chocolate flavored 6

 

CVS Nutritional Shake

Product positioning: – naturally & artificially flavored, made with real diafiltered milk, gluten free, suitable for lactose intolerance, kosher

Calories: 220 calories per 8-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 6 g fat, 33 g total carbs, 9 g protein.

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: sugar, brown rice syrup, corn maltodextrin, sucromalt. Protein sources: milk protein concentrate, soy protein concentrate. Fat sources: soy oil, canola oil, corn oil. Diafiltered skim milk contributes to carbs & protein amount simultaneously.

EDTLA TASTE RATING: Milk chocolate flavor (not tasted)

 

Kroger Nutrition Shake Fortify Plus

Product positioning: -advertised as to help gain or maintain a healthy weight & kosher, naturally & artificially sweetened milk chocolate

Calories: 350 calories per 8-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 11g fat, 50 g total carbs, 13 g protein.

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: corn maltodextrin, sugar. Protein sources: milk protein, soy protein isolate. Fat sources: corn oil, canola oil.

EDTLA TASTE RATING: Chocolate flavored 6

 

Orgain Nutritional SupplementsOrgain Organic Nutrition Product Family

Product positioning: weight management, meal replacement, or for medical needs;-also gluten-free, soy-free, non-GMO, high protein, organic & kosher.

Complete Protein Shake-Sweet Vanilla Bean

Designated as Grass Fed Dairy

Calories: 250 calories per 11-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 7 g fat, 32 g total carbs, 16 g protein

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: organic brown rice syrup, organic cane sugar, organic rice dextrins. Protein sources: organic grass fed milk, protein concentrate, organic whey protein concentrate. Fat sources: organic high oleic sunflower oil

EDTLA TASTE RATING: 4

 

Plant Based Protein Shake-Smooth Chocolate

Designated as Vegan & Dairy Free

Calories: 220 calories per 11-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 6 g fat, 25 g total carbs, 16 g protein.

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: organic rice dextrins, organic cane sugar. Protein sources: organic brown rice protein concentrate, organic hemp protein concentrate, organic chia seeds, organic flax powder. Fat sources: organic high oleic sunflower oil

EDTLA TASTE RATING: 4

 

Kate Farms Nutritional SupplementsKate Farms Product Family

Product Positioning: certified gluten free, free of common allergens (no milk, wheat, soybeans, peanuts, tree nuts, eggs, fish, shellfish), corn-free, 18 g plant based protein, MCT oil in some varieties, 29 superfoods, kosher. Contains organic ingredients. Kate Farms is a family start-up company based on the love and re-nourishment of a daughter with Cerebral Palsy. This is a great choice if looking for a multi-tiered caloric supplement company that is non-dairy and has alternative macronutrient sources than the mainstream brands. Kate Farms Core Essential Formulas may be covered by insurance for oral use and tube feeding. Coverage depends on the patient’s diagnosis and insurance plan.

 

Komplete

Calories: 290 calories per 11-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 8 g fat, 41 g total carbs, 16 g protein

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: brown rice syrup solids, organic agave syrup. Protein sources: organic pea protein, organic rice protein. Fat sources: organic high oleic sunflower oil

EDTLA TASTE RATING: Available in Chocolate/Coffee/Vanilla (not tasted).

 

Core Essentials Standard Formula 1.0 cal/mL:

Calories: 325 calories per 11-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 10 g fat, 41 g total carbs, 18 g protein

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: brown rice syrup solids, organic agave syrup. Protein sources: organic pea protein, organic rice protein. Fat sources: organic high linoleic sunflower oil, medium chain triglycerides (MCT) derived from coconut oil.

EDTLA TASTE RATING: 4 chocolate flavor, 2 vanilla flavor “chalky”

 

Core Essentials Peptide Plus 1.5 cal/mL:

Calories: 500 calories per 11-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 25 g fat, 41 g total carbs, 24 g protein

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: brown rice syrup solids, organic agave syrup. Protein sources: organic hyrolyzed pea protein, organic rice protein. Fat sources: organic sunflower oil, medium chain triglycerides (MCT) derived from coconut oil, organic flax seed oil.

EDTLA TASTE RATING: Plain flavor 1 (perhaps best not to drink alone but add to a shake or mix in foods for extreme nutrient density or just use in tube feedings)

 

Other Brands/Products

Benecalorie Nutritional SupplementsBenecalorie

Product positioning: calorie and protein food enhancer, mixes easily into most foods & beverages including milkshakes/yogurt/hot cereal/mash potatoes, unflavored, suitable for lactose intolerance, gluten-free, kosher, not for people with galactosemia, not recommended for tube feeding (not a liquid)

Calories: 330 calories per 1.5-ounce serving

Macronutrients: 33 g fat, 0 g total carbs, 7 g protein

Ingredients: Carbohydrate sources: no carbohydrates but does contain the artificial sweetener sucralose. Protein sources: calcium caseinate from milk. Fat sources: high oleic sunflower oil

EDTLA TASTE RATING: By itself: not tasted. Mixed into oatmeal as suggested 7 (“not a significant change in taste or texture of oatmeal”)

 

I hope this review is helpful and provides encouragement to venture into supplements if recommended by your treatment team.

April 2018 LACPA Eating Disorder SIG

Ovidio Bermudez, MDLA area professionals are invited to the April 2018 LACPA Eating Disorder SIG event. This event is open to non-members!

Date: Tuesday, April 24th at 7:00 pm 

Presenter: Ovidio Bermudez, MD, FAAP, FSAHM, FAED, F.iaedp, CEDS 

Title: Understanding Brain Development in the Treatment of Eating Disorders

Description: This presentation will review three concepts of the current understanding of brain development.  The first is proliferation and pruning as the brain grows via enhancement of gray matter and white matter.  The second is sequential maturation and fully coming online of different areas of the brain and how this may help us understand emotion regulation.  Third how environmental and hormonal influences may affect brain development.  In addition, how this may be applied to the treatment of eating disorders in children and adolescents will be discussed.

Bio:  Ovidio Bermudez, M.D. is the Medical Director of Child and Adolescent Services and Chief Clinical Education Officer at Eating Recovery Center in Denver, Colorado. He holds academic appointments as Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Pediatrics at the University of Colorado School of Medicine and University of Oklahoma College of Medicine. He is Board certified in Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine.

Dr. Bermudez is a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine, the Academy for Eating Disorders, and the International Association of Eating Disorders Professionals. He is Past Chairman and currently Senior Advisor to the Board of Directors of the National Eating Disorders Association, Co-Founder of the Eating Disorders Coalition of Tennessee (EDCT) and Co-founder of the Oklahoma Eating Disorders Association (OEDA). He is a Certified Eating Disorders Specialist and training supervisor by the International Association of Eating Disorders Professionals.

Dr. Bermudez has lectured nationally and internationally on eating pathology across the lifespan, obesity, and other topics related to pediatric and adult healthcare. He has been repeatedly recognized for his dedication, advocacy, professional achievement and clinical excellence in the field of eating disorders.

Location:  The office of Dr. Lauren Muhlheim (4929 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 245, Los Angeles) – free parking in the lot (enter on Highland)

RSVP to:  [email protected]

March and April SIG meetings are open to all professionals.   During other months SIG meetings are open to all LACPA members.  Nonmembers wishing to attend may join LACPA by visiting our website www.lapsych.org

Who Gets Treated for Eating Disorders in Los Angeles?

Who Gets Treated for Eating Disorders in Los Angeles?This NEDAwareness week, I’ve been thinking a lot about the theme of “Let’s Get Real.” One stubborn myth about eating disorders is that they affect primarily white, upper-middle-class females.

It would take you just one afternoon at my own Los Angeles practice to discover how untrue this is. My clients are all genders, ages, and ethnicities. I accept some private insurance and one public insurance. Among my patients with eating disorders are non-native English speakers, immigrants from low SES backgrounds, and people on public assistance.

The myth that eating disorders affect only the wealthy not only makes it more difficult for patients who don’t meet the stereotype to recognize that they have a problem but affects the entire system of treatment.

Throughout the US, there is a shortage of publicly funded specialized treatment programs for eating disorders. And specialized eating disorder treatment is expensive! The residential treatment complex only serves the economically privileged.

Carolyn Becker, Ph.D. recently brought attention to the presence of eating disorders in food insecure populations. The research on which she collaborated studied adults receiving food at San Antonio area food banks. Those who had hungry children in their households (representing higher levels of food insecurity) had higher levels of binge eating, dietary restraint, weight self-stigma, worry, and overall ED pathology when compared to participants with lower levels of food insecurity

Within Los Angeles County, eating disorders are a covered diagnosis by the Department of Mental Health (DMH). However, according to a DMH district chief, there are no specialized services for eating disorders within the DMH system. I recently led a training on eating disorders at one of the county community mental health centers and a staff member there told me, “Most patients with eating disorders are seen in primary care and none of us are trained specifically in this… What we need is training in evidence-based treatment.”

A clinical staff member at another DMH clinic said, “Honestly, we don’t have a lot of access to resources for people with eating disorders and aren’t equipped to adequately handle serious cases at this clinic. Referrals have always been difficult and there are no reliable referral sources for our patient population. We have really only been able to connect a few of our most severe cases to any treatment at all.”

I searched the Alliance for Eating Disorder Awareness list of Medicare/Medicaid providers and facilities within 50 miles of Los Angeles and came up with only one Medicare provider and no Medicaid providers or facilities.

This blog post was inspired because as a provider for Anthem Medi-Cal, I am receiving calls from county clinics with referrals of other (non-Anthem) Medi-Cal patients with eating disorders that I can’t see. So, when faced with a patient with an eating disorder and no insurance in LA County, what’s a provider to do?  Here’s what I’ve been able to find. If you have other resources, I’d love to hear about them!

Resources

Hospitals

CHLA takes California Medicaid for patients under age 25 needing medical stabilization.

UCLA takes California Medicaid for patients under age 25 needing hospitalization for eating disorders.

General low-fee counseling centers

Southern California Counseling Center

Maple Counseling Center

The Wright Institute

Cal Lutheran Low Fee Counseling Center

Treatment Scholarships

Center for Discovery and Project Heal provide treatment scholarships.

Source

Becker, Carolyn Black, Keesha Middlemass, Brigitte Taylor, Clara Johnson, and Francesca Gomez. 2017. “Food Insecurity and Eating Disorder Pathology.” International Journal of Eating Disorders 50 (9): 1031–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22735.

 

Thanks to Rosewood Center Santa Monica for help with the referral list.